There are two different ways to derive the layer-integrated
equations. Burchard and Petersen (1997) transform first the
equations into general vertical coordinate form
(see Deleersnijder and Ruddick (1992))
and afterwards
integrate the transformed equations over constant intervals in
the transformed space. Lander et al. (1994) integrate the
equations in the Cartesian space over surfaces by
considering the Leibniz rule
for any function .
For the vertical staggering of the layer notation see figure
7.
More details about the layer integration are given in Burchard and Petersen (1997).
With the further definitions of layer integrated transport,
layer mean velocities,
and layer averaged tracer concentrations and buoyancy,
and the grid related vertical velocity,
the continuity equation (3) has the layer-integrated form:
It should be noted that the grid related velocity is located on the layer interfaces. After this, the layer-integrated momentum equations read as:
with suitably chosen advective horizontal
velocities
and
(see section 8.13.7) on page
,
the shear stresses
and
and the horizontal buoyancy gradients
(30) |
and
(31) |
The layer integration of the pressure gradient force is discussed in detail by Burchard and Petersen (1997).
A conservative formulation can be derived
for the recalculation of the physical vertical velocity
which is convenient
in the discrete space if
is evaluated at the layer centres
(see Deleersnijder and Ruddick (1992)):
It should be mentioned that only needs to be evaluated for
post-processing reasons.
For the layer-integrated tracer concentrations, we obtain the following expression:
It should be noted that the "horizontal" diffusion does no longer occur along geopotential surfaces but along horizontal coordinate lines. The properly transformed formulation would include some cross-diagonal terms which may lead to numerical instabilities due to violation of monotonicity. For an in-depth discussion of this problem, see Beckers et al. (1998) and Beckers et al. (2000).